Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

Protecting Malaysia's Cultural Heritage with Batik Designs (2024)

  Case Study Summary: Concerns over the illegal duplication and sale of Malaysian batik designs, especially by foreign producers, increased in 2024. Without permission, these traditional motifs—which are ingrained in artistic legacy and cultural identity—were being replicated, endangering the livelihood of regional craftspeople and weakening the legitimacy of Malaysian batik. Stakeholders responded by emphasizing the value of batik protection under Malaysia's Copyright Act 1987, which acknowledges batik designs as artistic creations. This protection gives authors the sole right to use, reproduce, and distribute their creations for as long as they live, plus an additional 50 years. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of copyright laws in protecting intangible cultural heritage and making sure that traditional artistic expressions are not used for profit without giving due credit to the intended audience. In order for both producers and consumers to understand and respect...

Latest Posts

Meme Culture's Legality in the Digital Age - Griner v. King (2024–2025): “Success Kid”

Can You Sell Fake Disney Toys in Malaysia?

Can You Use Someone’s Instagram Video Without Permission? -The Nora Danish Case

Screenshots, Lawsuits & "Fair Use"? — Richard Prince and the Instagram Appropriation Controversy

Going Viral Doesn’t Mean It's Free — Sara Nadzirah vs. Khirulanuar (2023)

Upin, Ipin, and the Case of the Counterfeit T-Shirts

Who Owns AI-Generated Content? Copyright Law in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

When Copyright Meets Celebrity Identity: The Choi Yena & Olivia Rodrigo Controversy

Photographer Sued for Using Her Own Photo: A Getty Images Controversy

When Fashion Meets the Law: How 'Siti Khadijah' Defended Her Telekung Design